1.
If cycling on the public highway, your local authority has a statutory responsibility to maintain and
repair the road such that it is fit and safe for ordinary traffic.
If you are injured or your bike is damaged, the starting point is to decide whether the
pothole is a probable danger to cyclists.
There are no rules about what size pothole qualifies but a court will have to be convinced that it was dangerous enough to cause an accident in the particular circumstances: for example, gaps around a drain cover can be a real danger to cyclists but not to a motorist.
There are no rules about what size pothole qualifies but a court will have to be convinced that it was dangerous enough to cause an accident in the particular circumstances: for example, gaps around a drain cover can be a real danger to cyclists but not to a motorist.
Local authorities can defeat pothole claims if they
can convince the court that they have taken reasonable care to ensure the road was not dangerous for traffic. Therefore, the evidence that a council can bring about its inspections, repairs and maintenance programme will often be
critical to the outcome of a claim.
Compensation
will be reduced for contributory fault if the court
finds that a cyclists wasn’t paying enough attention to the road ahead (
and ironically, the larger the hole the more likely that a council can
run a successful argument), or if the pothole was on a
familiar route, or near the cyclist’s home.
Again, all road users are expected to take reasonable
care of their own safety, and that includes keeping a look out on the road ahead.
At
Dowse & Co we have a good track record of pursuing
pothole claims and have won cases contested hard by local
authorities.
Call Patrick Spence with any queries on 0207 254 6205.
No comments:
Post a Comment